This is a five minute transcript taken from the ninety minute interview with Will Thomas on 8th July.

Will Thomas: Beyond the spraying of the chemicals found in chemtrails, we
have also this HAARP phenomenon. And again, speaking solely of HAARP, let
alone putting the two together (and they are used together all the time),
HAARP is definitely changing the jetstream. We are finding weather people
almost daily remarking how the jet stream is out of balance, off kilter and
way out of position -

Jeff Rense: “Where is it today?” Jeeze. You look at the map and you can
see, the thing is just… bizarre, what’s going on.

Will Thomas: It is bizarre, and they’ve linked it directly to that horrific
flooding we’ve seen recently. They’ve linked it to all kinds of weather
changes, but the one thing they cannot do is explain why it is so far up
from normal. The people I talk to, including scientists, point to HAARP as
a primary factor in moving the jet stream. And you know, you point to the
Air Force’s goal of controlling the weather… yeah, they’re a long way down
the road to messing with the weather but I would respectfully suggest that
they are a very long way from controlling (laughs) such a large and
unpredictable system. In fact, they’re tampering with it and making things
much worse.

Jeff Rense: What do you see down the road? Are they going to stop this
absurd playing with Mother Nature, or will they just keep trying to now fix
what they’ve at least partially broken?

Will Thomas: According to my source called Hank — this is a gentleman who
served in the U.S. military in the Gulf; very up on physics, science,
electromagnetics; a man I’ve been working with and breaking major stories
for 15 years; a man who often has a pair of ‘intelligence agents’ at his
door (which he had just a few days ago, complimenting us on a story I was
just about to break) and he’s going on television in Italy later in the week
concerning some atomic secrets that should be outed — Hank has been telling
me for years, Jeff, about a standing wave produced off the south coast of
Africa with HAARP…

Jeff Rense: Uh-huh?

Will Thomas: … and the answer to your question is that this standing wave
off the coast of Africa is sending waves of energy right around the planet,
and at this point is beyond the ability, he says, of the American military
and government to turn the thing off or down, because of the oscillations
that could be unleashed. He further states that the Chinese have a couple
of smaller transmitters outside Beijing and they’ve been trying to fend this
thing off, because according to Hank and others it’s been responsible for
their recent and previous earthquakes. Unfortunately, he says, their
transmitters are of lower power and they’re super-heterodyning while
inadvertently piggybacking off the power coming out of the South Africa
coast there and drawing it to them, making matters worse. So if this
information is accurate — and I’ve never known Hank to be wrong, he’s very
careful — if this is accurate, then we have a geomagnetic war being waged
as we speak tonight. He says, “In order to turn theirs off [that’s the
Chinese] we’d have to turn ours down so it’s no longer holding theirs in
place.” I’m quoting a recent interview here. “We turn ours down and all
Hell could break loose in many places all over the world.”
Jeff Rense: Ah ha.

Will Thomas: “So we seem to be locked in to various HAARP experiments. “
Jeff Rense: That’s pretty weird, that whole scene you’ve just laid out.
Now, for our listeners you might explain what a standing wave is, Will, so
that they can understand it. You’re not talking about a wave of water in the
south Atlantic, but it’s a wave of -

Will Thomas: No -
Jeff Rense: - electromagnetic energy.

Will Thomas: That’s right. A wave of energy that’s anchored on the sea
floor. They used a similar standing wave off the coast of Louisiana to tip
the oncoming Katrina into a very different trajectory. Hank referred to it
as a ‘bank shot’ deflecting it away from Texas -
Jeff Rense: (laughs) Right.

Will Thomas: - and into what he referred to as a “sacrificial” landing on
the coast of -

Jeff Rense: That was about a 90-degree turn, yeah.

Will Thomas: Yeah, we’ve never seen that before. And he said that, while
chemtrails per se were not involved, P5As (the big galaxy jet transports)
were flying into Katrina and dropping polymers into its center, and as these
spun up in the storm they elongated, he said, like spaghetti, wrapped
circularly around this storm, and then they could hit THAT with HAARP.
HAARP needs something to hit. That’s interesting to corroborate, because I
spoke with Dr. Bernard Eastlund some years back, asking him what the heck he
was doing inventing something like HAARP, and he said it was primarily aimed
at weather control

may be a result of geowarfare - at least in part.

Click here for five min mp3 clip  of an interview with Will Thomas
author of Chemtrails Confirmed.

This is a clip from  a 90 minute interview a few days ago.

Will Thomas is talking about an electromagnetic wave
generated by HAARP which is presently anchored of the coast of Africa.

The Military are unable to stop this wave as they are believe the
resulting oscillations would cause untold damage worldwide.

The second part of the problem concerns the Chinese who are trying to
deflect this wave with two smaller HAARP type devices.

http://en.epochtimes.com/news/8-7-9/73205.html

By Zhang Haishan
Epoch Times Staff
 Jul 09, 2008

Picture showing how the mountain area in the earthquake region looks like after a big explosion. Local villagers said the explosion was so huge that the big mountain seemed to be cut in the middle.

A high-level Chinese military source secretly disclosed last week that the recent earthquake in Sichuan Province caused a chain-reaction of explosions in the Sichuan mountain areas. The explosions destroyed Chinese army’s largest armory, new weapon test bases and part of nuclear facilities including several nuclear warheads. This information is considered China’s top military secret.

After the earthquake, Chinese authorities had ignored the disaster victim’s initial calls for help. Only after the first critical 72 hours had passed did the authorities allow international aid to be delivered to the disaster region. Military analysts believe that this delay occurred because Mianyang City of Sichuan Province is one of important areas for the Chinese military nuclear industries and also its largest armory. The Chinese regime did not want potential spies from the outside world in this very sensitive military area during a time when there may have been a nuclear accident.

“I went to see the site of the explosion again. Villagers on the road told me, ‘These concrete blocks and soil were from the explosion,’” said a medical team member. (Photo provided by mainland Chinese Internet Users)

According to sources, a nuclear accident did happen. On June 27, the Chinese military disclosed that 2,700 chemical cleanup workers had been sent to earthquake disaster areas for nuclear chemical emergency rescue.

A villager said, “At that time, I heard a huge explosion and saw red substances tens of meters high rising off the mountain. This scared me to death.” (Picture provided by mainland Chinese Internet Users)

After carefully analyzing seismic data, military experts in southeast Asia confirmed a non-geological shock had occurred at the earthquake epicenter. The energy released was equivalent to that of an underground nuclear explosion.

China News Service (CNS) reported earlier that some Chinese experts had made a seismic analysis and suggested that a nuclear explosion might have occurred at the epicenter. At that time, it was said by official military sources that the readings were due to a huge explosion of a large-scale military armory in Sichuan.

On May 23, 2008, a chemical defense troop of the Chinese army was deployed to Chenjiaba Township, Beichuan County. (The Epoch Times)
On May 23, 2008, a chemical defense troop of the Chinese army was deployed to Chenjiaba Township, Beichuan County. (The Epoch Times)

According to a CNS report on May 31, titled “Suspicious Epicenter of the Epicenter Was Found,” on May 23, a medical team, consisting of paramedics from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) hospitals and psychologists from Beijing, found onsite a one- kilometer (0.62 mile) wide and two kilometers (1.24 mile) long valley on a hill close to the epicenter. The long ravine was found to have been covered with concrete debris 10-20 inches thick at its bottom as if large cement blocks were tossed about randomly surrounding the immediate area.

A team member said, “Where did those concrete blocks come from?” Since there were no large buildings nearby, everybody was curiously talking about it but could not find an answer. A local resident surnamed He talked about what had happened.

He said many villagers were working in their fields at the time of the earthquake on May 12. The earth suddenly shook and shortly afterwards, a thunderous sound came out of the mountain. Immediately after the explosion, they then saw a huge hole form at the top of the mountain. Many things were pushed out of this hole like toothpaste being squeezed out. “Was it magma?” somebody asked. “No, those were concrete blocks,” said He. “The eruption lasted about three minutes,” he added.

Earthquakes may sometimes result in a volcanic eruption, but no concrete eruption has ever been recorded, said an expert. Based on the CNS report, several experts have suggested the eruption could have been caused by a huge explosion beneath the mountain, which shattered the concrete cover of the underground facilities and pushed them to the surface. The thickness of the concrete blocks pushed to the surface seemed to match the cover layer used in China’s underground military bases.

The safety of nuclear facilities located near the earthquake epicenter was bound to attract international attention. Many countries are monitoring the area closely for radioactive fall-out. In a recent press conference, Air Force Major General Ma Jian, a military spokesperson said, “The nuclear facilities are safe.”

from www.davidicke.com
At 2.45am this morning the David Icke video presentation ‘Big Brother - The Big Picture’ was the most watched video on Google in the UK and the eighth most watched Google video in the world.
 
David’s video from 1996, ‘Turning of the Tide’, in which he describes the world that we are now experiencing was the fifth most viewed in the UK. 
 
This is why David stood in the Big Brother By-Election, to communicate information, not to win votes. And we can do it without the mainstream media.
Please keep circulating the videos to everyone you know and ask them to do the same. This is making a difference and everyone can play a part in that.
 
Just direct people to this page … http://www.davidicke.com/content/view/14373/48/ 

‘Anosognosia is a condition in which a person who suffers disability due to brain injury seems unaware of or denies the existence of his or her handicap. This may include unawareness of quite dramatic impairments, such as blindness or paralysis. It was first named by neurologist Joseph Babinski in 1914, although relatively little has been discovered about the cause of the condition since its initial identification. The word comes from the Greek words “nosos” disease and “gnosis” knowledge.’

It is known that all humans confabulate and this is a symptom of anosognosia.  It is also known that this phenomena is a feature of the left hemisphere of the brain.  Could the human race be unaware of its own perceptual difficulties that are causing the problems that we see in the world?  If so, what could be done to help??????? If all humans suffer this problem then who would be able to offer assistance?  Is the answer concerted efforts to nourish the right hemisphere (which from research appears to have the link to higher consciousness) and somehow let it have more influence over our lives?

(Sorry about the animals on cages… probably all the necessary info could have been obtained from the human experiments later in the video.)

by Michael Sharp

http://www.michaelsharp.org/2008/03/27/the-myth-of-left-brain-superiority/

Published by admin at 10:20 am under Academic Angle, Brain Function

Elizabeth A. Phelps of Yale University, Janet Metcalfe of Columbia University and Margaret Funnell, a postdoctoral fellow at Dartmouth College, have found that the two hemispheres differ in their ability to process new data. When presented with new information, people usually remember much of what they experience. When questioned, they also usually claim to remember things that were not truly part of the experience. If split-brain patients are given such tests, the left hemisphere generates many false reports. But the right brain does not; it provides a much more veridical account.” (Gazzaniga, 1998: 54).

Alright so in my last blog post I had some things to say about a neuroanatomist’s interpretation of her trauma induced “right brain experience.” What happened basically was a stroke shut down “something’ in the left hemisphere. This “shut down” subsequently opened the scientist up to a rather dramatically different way of looking at things. The variation from the “normal” experience of the scientist was striking and while she went on and on in effusive terms about the “glory” of the experience, I suggested that it was inappropriate to view her experience as anything other than as a kind of “awakening inner child” experience. After years of left brain dominance and right atrophy, suddenly the censors were turned off and the “child” (the higher processing facilities of the right brain) where exposed to reality with obvious and predictable results, i.e., childlike apprehension of reality and childlike affect
Now in my previous blog post, and in fact in the first person account of “right brain exposure,” there was a lot of discussion about right brain lateralization and I would like to explore that topic a bit more in subsequent blog posts. However, before we get into that I want to share a neuropsychological experiment with you. This was an experiment on brain lateralization. In this experiment researchers took two groups of individuals. Some had a transected corpus callosum (i.e., that part of the brain that connects the right and left hemisphere) and the other group were “intact normals.” (i.e., intact corpus callosum). The experimental participants were exposed to a learning learning test. This test involved a simple task visual task. Two lights were presented on a computer screen, one above the other, and the subjects were to guess which light was going to come on next, either the top or the bottom. (Wolford, 2000) .

Now in this experiment the lights were to appear randomly on the computer screen, but the top light was to appear 80% of the time while the bottom light would only come on 20% of the time. There was no other pattern to the display of lights other than this random, and rather obvious, pattern of distribution. And it was obvious! In fact, the pattern was so obvious that all subjects in the experiment quickly figured it out. That is, all subjects quickly realized that the top light was coming on a lot more frequently than the bottom line.

So what happened?

Well, the conditions were, guess correctly and so that’s what the subjects tried to do. As it turns out, intact controls (intact corpus callosum) and subjects where the stimuli was to the left brain only, performed with an average 68% accuracy.

Not bad I suppose.

Slightly better than random guessing and the left brain could be forgiven, if it weren’t for the dramatically superior performance of the right brain in this task. Contrary to the rather dismal performance of the linguistic, analytic, left brain, the right brain attained a spectacular 80% correct.

WOW!

How did it do that?

Well of course this is pure speculation but if you were to ask me I would say that the right brain, more closely connected to the Fabric of Consciousness than the left brain, and full of insight into the nature of the situation, quickly learned that the best strategy to maximize correct responses (the condition set by the experimenter) was to simply push the top button all the time. By choosing this seemingly “simple” strategy, the right brain guaranteed itself an 80% on the experimenter’s binary exam. Pretty amazing when you think about it.

And why the poor performance of the poor left brain?

Ah well that’s the rub, isn’t it.

The researchers explained it by suggesting that the left brain “distributes its responses between the two alternatives…despite the fact that this is a suboptimal strategy.” (Roser and Gazzaniga, 2004: 58. emphasis added).

And why does the left brain distribute its responses in this way?

Well I would say that it’s because, despite all the analytic, linguistic, and logical grandeur of the left hemisphere, the left brain, which is modularized for certain types of tasks, lacks basic insight. It tends to get lost in the details of things, turned around in circles, “looking for order and reason, even when there is none–which leads it continually to make mistakes. It tends to overgeneralize, frequently constructing a potential past as opposed to a true one.” (Gazzaniga, 1998: 54). In other words it’s good at some things, but incredibly dumb at other things.

This can be a bit of a problem for people who have become convinced that the left brain’s logical and rational capacities are recent evolutionary adaptations that signal an emergence of human rational superiority. This is classical thinking and it underlies a lot of the neurological thinking on lateralization. The idea that human rationality and logic, i.e., left brain functionality is the sine qua non of evolutionary advance is generally accepted. Experimenters would agree. Roser and Gazzaniga (2004) take the poor performance of the left hemisphere to be evidence of the “hypothesis-generating” nature of the left hemisphere. To me, it’s a strange conclusion. How one can conclude that the left hemisphere is all about the generation of hypothesis while faced with the clear failure of the left hemisphere to generate an adequate hypothesis!

And it was a simple task!

Yet, despite the simplistic nature of the task, the left brain just doodled along in confusion while the right slammed down a home run. What’s worse I think is that to bolster the idea that the left brain is good at thinking, researchers go on to dismiss the abilities of the right brain comparing it to rat thinking and suggesting that the right hemisphere “…does not try to interpret its experience and find deeper meaning. It continues to live only in the thin moment of the present–and to be correct 80 percent of the time.”(Gazzaniga, 1998: 54).

Hmm.

If you ask me, that’s a confabulation.

It’s the scientists left brain talking. The left brain, the one that controls the mouth, is looking at a task that it is inferior at and suggesting an interpretation that maintains the illusion of its superiority.

Confabulation.

It is an established neurological fact!

Whenever neurological subjects are exposed to some kind of deficit, they confabulate. “…when asked to explain why it is attempting to figure the whole sequence, [it] always comes up with a theory, no matter how outlandish”(Gazzaniga, 1998: 54).

It’s true!

So what does all this have to do with our discussion of the spiritual experience of the right brain. First of all, while I wouldn’t want to dis the left brain completely here, I would want to point out that the idea that the left brain’s linguistic, categorizing, “hypothesis generating” rationality is in any way superior to the right brain is incorrect. We have a clear and rather stunning example of left brain incompetence. It is reasonable to question whether or not the right brain is indeed inferior in any way to the left hemisphere, especially in the simplistic way that our neuro-scientist presented in her analysis. The right brain obviously has some smarts and these have to be taken into account.

Second, the research and commentary here really highlights the inadequacy of Dr. B’s account. You might be forgiven if, after hearing Dr. B. effusive account, you think the right is nothing but a “LA LA” space for Nirvanic Junkies. But that wouldn’t be true. The right brain has many functions which are important not only to survival on this earth, but also (as we will see) to the full expression of Spirit (a.k.a. consciousness) in matter. Something that isn’t even intimated in the original account.

I believe I want to explore this for a while. Next time I would like to take a look at the neurological truths of brain lateralization. I know the mythology of lateralization. It’s a recent evolutionary advance that put humans “one step ahead” of their animal cousin. It’s the left brain that’s important and nothing much has been lost in our rampage towards the modern world. But what’s the truth of lateralization (mystical or scientific) and how to do we understand “the brain” in relation to the ontological primacy spirit. From there we’ll move on to discuss the function of the brain and CNS in relation to the “la la” lands of Spirit.

Until then,

ms

References

Gazzaniga, Michael S. (1998). The Split Brain Revisited. Scientific American. 279(Jul98): 50-56.

Metcalfe, Janet., Funnell, Margaret, and Gazzaniga, Michael S. Right-hemisphere Memory Superiority: Studies of a Split-brain Patient. Psychological Science. 6(3): 157-164.

Phelps E.,. and Gazzaniga, M.S. (1992). Hemispheric Differences in Mnemonic Processing. The Effects of Hemisphere Interpretation. Neuropsychologia. 30: 293-297.

Pinet, John P. (2007). Basics of Biopsychology. New York: Pearson.

Roser, Mathew and Gazzinga, Michael S. (2004). Automatic Brains–Interpretive Minds. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 13(2): 56-59

Wolford, G., Miller, M.B., Gazzaniga, M. (2000). The Left Hemisphere’s role in Hypothesis Formation. Journal of Neuroscience 20, RC64.

Tuesday, July 08, 2008 by: Michael Cambray

http://www.naturalnews.com/023581.html

(NaturalNews) Thinking deeply about the current scare campaign on global warming and the latest ‘natural’ disasters occurring around the world, it is becoming more and more obvious, in my opinion, that these ‘natural’ disasters are anything but natural.

It has been proven throughout the ages that for every action there is a reaction and we are playing games with Mother Nature at our peril.

It seems there are very few people associating the massive increase in the use of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) and electromagnetic frequencies (EMF) with changes in the environment.

We are very susceptible to the electrical environment. It has been firmly established by scientists testing mobile phones, computers and all similar products that EMF and EMR disrupt the body’s cell growth mechanism, disturbing the brain, nervous and immune systems.

The ever-growing sources of radiation in our everyday lives that can cause major problems to our health include power-lines, computers, hi-fi radios, I-pods, televisions, mobile phones and towers, satellites, x-rays, radios, fluorescent lighting, microwave ovens, electric blankets, all domestic appliances and wiring in the home. From a television alone there are ELF, VLF, infrared, ultraviolet rays, microwaves and radio waves.

As biological stress occurs on a cellular level and you cannot see it, it doesn’t mean it’s not there!

Have you ever wondered where all these EMF and EMR waves go?

Think about it for a moment. There are electrical waves flowing around us and through us without a pause wherever we are, awake or asleep, indoors or outdoors and they are increasing daily.
Seriously… do they just fade away? Do they gather momentum and get stronger? Do they keep going for eternity? Do they float off into the universe? They have to do something, go somewhere — surely everything has got to go somewhere? Is this a silly question? I don’t think so.

If it affects us individually, then what snowball effect is all this extreme radiation having on the climate of our world?

Further on this subject here is a story concerning an episode that apparently took place several years ago and was authenticated by the BBC T.V. in London at the time. It appears that a whole host of unrelated people all over the Midlands of the U.K. experienced an odd phenomenon. All at the same time, during a BBC program, people lost the BBC picture and received instead, for over an hour, an American television program from Houston in Texas.

On receiving many queries and complaints (with some confirming videos people took of the program), the BBC reportedly investigated and found that the American program was over three years old and that the Houston station no longer existed! They ruled out the possibility of a hoax and admitted they could not explain the odd happening.

Three years? Where were these pictures for those three years? What were they doing? We know where they came from, where were they going?

That is an interesting report, as it seems to support my theory that these EMF waves do not dissipate. They just keep going around and around. To me this could explain one of the many reasons for the alarming increase in world mental health problems, emotional problems and weather patterns. After all, they must eventually affect our brains and the atmosphere at some level and that level is constantly rising.

I find the possibility of there being some truth in these theories fascinating. What do you think?

Michael is a naturopath of 30 years experience and has been studying the effects of EMF and EMR for the past 8 years. Michael would welcome any constructive comments.

David Icke speaks to the constituents of Haltemprice and Howden about the ‘Big Brother’ election, forced by the resignation of David Davis, …all » David Icke speaks to the constituents of Haltemprice and Howden about the ‘Big Brother’ election, forced by the resignation of David Davis, and the move towards the global Big Brother enslavement we are all facing

From www.davidicke.com:

FREE DAVID ICKE VIDEOS TO SEE AND CIRCULATE AS WIDELY AS POSSIBLE  
  
 
These include his presentation at his Big Brother By-Election Public Meeting  
 
These videos by David Icke will have a dramatic effect on global awareness if enough people take the time and trouble to circulate them far and wide - short of spamming. Please send them to anyone and everyone you know and ask the receivers to do the same and so on. 

In a short time through this method of circulation we could have tens of millions of people seeing this information worldwide and make a massive difference to human awareness of what is happening in the world that we daily experience.

Big Brother is terrified of such information circulating, so let’s do it as widely as possible all over the world.
 
These videos are free for anyone to use and circulate, put onto DVD for free, and basically circulate as anyone chooses - SHORT of commercial use. David retains the copyright for commercial use and these are intended only to be circulated for free as David himself is doing. By all means add subtitles to them in any language you wish (so long as they are accurate!).
 
Please mention that people can get even more information and daily updates on the latest headlines page at Davidicke.com.

It would be helpful if people also go into the Google version to push up the hit numbers and make it more likely that passing eyes will see it. 
 
Thank-you for your help with this - it is a way you can make a fantastic contribution to global awareness very quickly.